 |
Speak Up! - View Question #277 |
 printer friendly version
Question: Can a target security Guard arrest you for shoplifting, and will they get in trouble for not reading your Miranda rights?
Answer: First off, the only people that can arrest you for a crime are police officers. When you are in a store and are caught shoplifting by a store detective or security guard, they are not the people charging you with the crime of shoplifting. Instead, they are the witness to the crime, and may also be the victim of the crime. They inform the police of the crime, and the police then arrest you for shoplifting.
As far as Miranda warnings go you probably need to first understand what they are, in order to understand what a failure to give them means. In the famous Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, the courts decided that the prosecution may not use statements stemming from the interrogation of a defendant while in custody, unless the officers first it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure privilege against self-incrimination. Miranda v. Arizona 86 S.Ct. 1602, U.S. Ariz 1966.
In common English, this means that if the State puts you in custody somehow [i.e., you are arrested] and the police are asking you questions, they must first make sure that your 5th Amendment right not to self-incriminate is somehow protected. The courts decided that a persons 5th Amendment right to self-incrimination will be protected [when a person is in custody, and is being asked questions by the police] if the police provide a warning to them explaining what their constitutional rights are. Thus, the term Miranda warning.
Therefore, you are not going to get Miranda warnings if you are not in custody or not being interrogated.
The failure of a police officer to give you a Miranda warning while arresting you does not mean that you can get out of jail for free it just means that you werent warned to keep your mouth shut and if you say anything, it cant be used against you. For instance, lets say that you arrested for shoplifting, and the officer DID GIVE you a Miranda warning. If you then confessed to shoplifting, this would be a good confession and it would be admitted in court. Now lets pretend that you were arrested for shoplifting, but the officer forgot to give you Miranda warnings. If you then confessed, it would NOT BE a good confession. That is because you made your confession not fully informed of your rights, and the confession could not be used in court against you. In either case, your arrest still stands the failure to give you a Miranda warning just limits the evidence that the prosecution can use against you in trial to prove your guilt.
|
| Comments |
| 16 thru 20 of 20 comments |
1 2 3 [ 4 ]
|
|
On 11/26/03
Konstantinos from CA said:
If you commit a crime in the State Of California in the presence of any private person (Security Guards) are also private persons a non sworn law enforcement.
May place you under arrest, however when a police officer response and un-arrest said person then you might face liabity issue for wrongful arrest.
In the State of California a private person may NOT detain anyone only sworn law enforcement or Security Oficers Working Directly for the Government or Contract Security that provides protection for the government
You rights can be written only by a sworn law enforcement
I hope this wa
|
On 09/25/03
Jonathan from CA said:
I think that Parents should already know their children's rights, and should'n't depend on a website (even though I like the way this website is set up)such as this. Children should be informed by their parents of what rights they have. My experience with Loss prevention suggests that if a child is monitored by their parent or a legal (and responsible) gaurdian, they are less likey to shoplift and victimize the respective or current retailer (whether it be Target, Mervyns, Wal-Mart, Best Buy, or Curcuit City).
|
On 08/27/03
Tom from SC said:
You may want to go back and read the Target Directives on the definition of Reasonable force.
No where does it say the word "ANY Force" , It is "THE" force necessary to stop the crime.
|
On 01/04/03
Dale from MN said:
As a Security Officer at Target Stores I can tell you that we do not make the arrest however we are authorized to use any reasonable force nessacery to detain a shoplifter until the Police Arrive. This includes the use of handcuffs. A lot of people believe when they are handcuffed they are under arrest, this is not true.
|
On 05/12/02
Jeff from VA said:
so what if a police officer at school has you in his office and questions you while writing a traffic ticket can what you say be held against you in court if you were not aware of your rights?
|
| 16 thru 20 of 20 comments |
1 2 3 [ 4 ]
|
|
|
